ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Shared and individual tuning curves for social vision.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stimuli with light are clearly visual; stimuli with sound are clearly auditory. But what makes a stimulus "social", and how do socialness judgments differ across people? Here, we characterize group-level and individual thresholds for perceiving the presence and nature of a social interaction. We leverage the fact that humans see social interactions-e.g., chasing, playing, fighting-even in very un-lifelike stimuli like animations of geometric shapes. Unlike prior work using these stimuli, we exploit their most advantageous property: their visual features are fully parameterizable. Using this property, we construct psychophysics-inspired "social tuning curves" for individual subjects. We find not only that simple visual features influence social perception, but also that the exact relationship (shape of the curve) is unique to and stable within each person, thus supporting the view that social information processing begins early in the perceptual hierarchy. Further, individual differences in social tuning curves are related to socio-affective traits. Our approach lays the foundation for a generative account of social perception in single individuals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.