ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
A qualitative study on general practitioners' perspectives on late-life depression in Singapore-part II: system- and physician-related factors.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating mental health care into primary and community care in Singapore: a vision based on Healthier SG.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the practices and resources employed by general practitioners (GPs) in Singapore to manage late-life depression. As the country is stepping up its efforts to promote collaborative care across community mental health and geriatric care, understanding GPs' current practices when managing late-life depression appears timely. Methods: This qualitative descriptive study explored the perspectives on late-life depression of 28 private GPs practicing in Singapore through online semi-structured group and individual interviews. GPs were purposively sampled across age, gender, and ethnicity. Analysis followed a reflexive thematic approach and focused on physician- and system-related factors. Findings: Clinical instinct, experience, and knowledge of appropriate resources for specific patients played an important role for GPs during late-life depression care. GPs paid particular attention to communicating with patients tactfully during initial assessments and diagnosis, although some GPs chose to be upfront with patients with whom they had already established rapport. Using non-English languages when communicating about depression could mitigate stigma in some cases but added confusion in others. GPs relied primarily on their own professional support network to manage late-life depression. Although GPs acknowledged the usefulness of public care services, they felt that collaborative care was hindered by a lack of efficient communication channels between providers and appropriate financial coverage to coordinate the frequently complex care of depressed older adults. Interpretation: Current resources and practices to manage late-life depression vary greatly between private GPs in Singapore. This needs to be considered during ongoing reforms to achieve effective collaborative care. Funding: This work was funded by the Division of Family Medicine Research Capabilities Building Budget under the project "Technology and Compassion: Improving Patient Outcomes Through Data Analytics and Patients' Voice in Primary Care" [NUHSRO/2022/049/NUSMed/DFM].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.