ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Assessing COVID-19 Pandemic-Era Vaccine Uptake and Adherence to Prevention Measures: A Comparative Analysis Among Men and Women Using Lot Quality Assurance Sampling in Central Uganda.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study examined citizens' knowledge and compliance with COVID-19 standard operating procedures (SOPs), vaccine acceptance and hesitancy, and factors that could influence these behaviors. Methods: The study that utilised the Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) approach was conducted in eight districts of Central Uganda; Kiboga, Kyankwanzi, Mubende, Kasanda, Mityana, Luwero, Nakaseke, and Nakasongola districts. Each district was divided into five supervision areas (SAs). Data were collected from 19 respondents per SA, focusing on women aged 15-49 years and men aged 15 years and above. A satisfactory performance for study indicators was determined by the LQAS decision rules. Results: There was high awareness of COVID-19, with 98.2% of women and 99.3% of men having heard of the pandemic. However, knowledge of at least four COVID-19 preventive measures was low, reported by only 45.4% of women and 48.6% of men. Adherence to social distancing measures in the previous 24 hours was modest, with 67.2% of men and 66.5% of women complying. There was a pronounced lack of hand hygiene, with only 24.8% of women and 19.0% of men frequently washing their hands or using hand sanitizer. COVID-19 vaccine uptake was relatively high for the first dose, with 83.5% of women and 83.0% of men receiving at least one dose. However, full vaccination coverage was low, at 37.5% for women and 41.5% for men. A hesitancy to get vaccinated was driven by fear of side effects, misinformation, doubts about vaccine effectiveness, long distances and queues, and beliefs that vaccines cause infertility. Conclusion: While awareness of COVID-19 was high, knowledge of preventative measures was lacking. The low vaccination rates highlight barriers to uptake. A tailored, trust-based messaging approach through community leaders was recommended to address these gaps. Inter-district and inter-SA disparities indicated the need for localized interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.