ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Development and external validation of a model to predict recurrence in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most patients initially diagnosed with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) still have frequent recurrence after urethral bladder tumor electrodesiccation supplemented with intravesical instillation therapy, and their risk of recurrence is difficult to predict. Risk prediction models used to predict postoperative recurrence in patients with NMIBC have limitations, such as a limited number of included cases and a lack of validation. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop new models to compensate for the shortcomings and potentially provide evidence for predicting postoperative recurrence in NMIBC patients. Methods: Clinicopathologic characteristics and follow-up data were retrospectively collected from 556 patients with NMIBC who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors by electrocautery (TURBT) from January 2014 to December 2023 at the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University and 167 patients with NMIBC who underwent the same procedure from January 2018 to April 2024 at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University. Independent risk factors affecting the recurrence of NMIBC were screened using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) and Cox regression analysis. Cox risk regression models and randomized survival forest (RSF) models were developed. The optimal model was selected by comparing the area under the curve (AUC) of the working characteristics of the subjects in both and presented as a column-line graph. Results: The study included data from 566 patients obtained from the affiliated hospital of Zunyi Medical University and 167 patients obtained from the third affiliated hospital of Zunyi Medical University. Tumor number, urine leukocytes, urine occult blood, platelets, and red blood cell distribution width were confirmed as independent risk factors predicting RFS by Lasso-Cox regression analysis. The Cox proportional risk regression model and RSF model were constructed based on Lasso, which showed good predictive efficacy in both training and validation sets, especially the traditional Cox proportional risk regression model. In addition, the discrimination, consistency, and clinical utility of the column-line graph were assessed using C-index, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Patients at high risk of recurrence can be identified early based on risk stratification. Conclusion: Internal and external validation has demonstrated that the model is highly discriminative and stable and can be used to assess the risk of early recurrence in NMIBC patients and to guide clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.