Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867888›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

CD56

Julia Wlosik, Florence Orlanducci, Manon Richaud, Clemence Demerle, Amira Ben Amara, Marie-Sarah Rouviere, Philippe Livrati, Laurent Gorvel, Marie-Anne Hospital, Nicolas Dulphy and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Julia WlosikTeam Immunity and Cancer, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, University of Aix-Marseille UM105, Marseille, France.
Florence OrlanducciTeam Immunity and Cancer, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, University of Aix-Marseille UM105, Marseille, France.
Manon RichaudCytometry Platform, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, University of Aix-Marseille UM105, Marseille, France.
Clemence DemerleCentre for Clinical Investigation in Biotherapy, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, University of Aix-Marseille, Inserm CBT 1409, Marseille, France.
Amira Ben AmaraTeam Immunity and Cancer, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, University of Aix-Marseille UM105, Marseille, France.
Marie-Sarah RouviereTeam Immunity and Cancer, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, University of Aix-Marseille UM105, Marseille, France.
Philippe LivratiTeam Immunity and Cancer, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, University of Aix-Marseille UM105, Marseille, France.
Laurent GorvelTeam Immunity and Cancer, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, University of Aix-Marseille UM105, Marseille, France.
Marie-Anne HospitalHematology Department, CRCM, Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Nicolas DulphyParis Cité University, Saint-Louis Research Institute, Inserm UMRS1160, Paris, France.
Raynier DevillierHematology Department, CRCM, Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Norbert VeyHematology Department, CRCM, Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Daniel Olive *Team Immunity and Cancer, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, University of Aix-Marseille UM105, Marseille, France.
Anne-Sophie Chretien *Team Immunity and Cancer, Cancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), Inserm U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, University of Aix-Marseille UM105, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rare haematological cancer with poor 5-years overall survival (OS) and high relapse rate. Leukemic cells are sensitive to Natural Killer (NK) cell mediated killing. However, NK cells are highly impaired in AML, which promote AML immune escape from NK cell immune surveillance. We made the first report of CD56neg CD16+ NK cells expansion in AML. This unconventional subset has been reported to expand in some chronic viral infections. Although it is unclear whether CD56neg NK cells expansion mechanism is common across diseases, it seems more relevant than ever to further investigate this subset, representing a potential therapeutic target. Methods: We used PBMCs from AML patients and HV to perform mass cytometry, spectral flow cytometry, bulk RNA-seq and in vitro assays in order to better characterize CD56neg CD16+ NK cells that expand in AML. Results: We confirmed that CD56neg CD16+ NK cells represent a unique NK cell subset coexpressing Eomes and T-bet. CD56neg CD16+ NK cells could recover CD56 expression in vitro where they displayed unaltered NK cell functions. We previously demonstrated that CD56neg CD16+ NK cells expansion at diagnosis was associated with adverse clinical outcome in AML. Here, we validated our findings in a validation cohort of N=38 AML patients. AML patients with CD56neg CD16+ NK cells expansion at diagnosis had decreased overall survival (HR[CI95]=5.5[1.2-24.5], p=0.0251) and relapse-free survival (HR[CI95]=13.1[1.9-87.5], p=0.0079) compared to AML patients without expansion after 36 months follow-up. RNA-seq unveiled that CD56neg CD16+ NK cells were mature circulating NK cells with functional capacities. Upon expansion, CD56neg CD16+ NK cells from AML patients showed altered proteomic phenotype, with increased frequency of terminally mature CD56neg CD16+ NK cells expressing TIGIT along with decreased frequency of Siglec-7+ CD56neg CD16+ NK cells. Discussion: Taken together, our results suggest that we could harness CD56neg CD16+ NK cells cytotoxic potential in vitro to restore NK cell anti-tumor response in AML patients with CD56neg CD16+ NK cells expansion and improve patients' prognosis. To conclude, CD56neg CD16+ NK cells represent a relevant target for future NK-cell-based immunotherapies in AML.

Indexed as

CD56 AntigenKiller Cells, NaturalLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteReceptors, IgGAdultAgedFemaleGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansImmunophenotypingMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePrognosisCD56 AntigenFCGR3B protein, humanGPI-Linked ProteinsNCAM1 protein, humanReceptors, IgGAMLcancerCD56 neg NK cellshigh-dimensional cytometryRNA-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39867888
PMCPMC11760599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.