ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Epicardial fat tissue, a hidden enemy against the early recovery of left ventricular systolic function after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epicardial fat and failed recovery after TAVI: A weak yet intriguing correlation.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epicardial fat tissue (EFT) is an active organ that can affect cardiac function and structure through endocrine, paracrine, and proinflammatory mechanisms. We hypothesized that greater thickness of EFT may harm the recovery of left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and reduced LV ejection fraction (EF ≤ 50 %) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: A sixty six patients with severe AS and 20 % ≥ LVEF ≤ 50 % who underwent TAVI were included. Patients were categorized into two groups based on LV systolic function recovery 30 days after TAVI defined by ≥ 20 % relative increase in LV Global longitudinal strain (GLS) from baseline. EFT was determined by ECG-gated contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Results: Forty-five patients (68.0 %) showed LV systolic function recovery. EFT showed no significant correlation with the baseline LV-GLS but was associated with less likelihood of LV systolic function recovery (OR 0.7, 95 % CI 0.50 - 0.98, P = 0.04). In the multivariate analysis, higher LVMI (OR 1.05, 95 % CI 1.00-1.10, P = 0.02), lower LV-GLS (OR 0.55, 95 % CI 0.40-0.82, P = 0.002), and thinner EFT (OR 0.38, 95 % CI 0.20-0.73, P = 0.003) were independently associated with LV systolic function recovery after TAVI. Conclusion: EFT extent is associated with LV systolic function recovery in AS patients with impaired LVEF undergoing TAVI and therefore may help in risk stratification and management of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.