Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867837›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

Coconut (

Seda Arioglu-Tuncil, Dane Deemer, Stephen R Lindemann, Yunus E Tunçil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A Comparative Assessment of Flaxseed (Food science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seda Arioglu-TuncilNutrition and Dietetics Department, Nezahat Keleşoğlu Health Sciences Faculty Necmettin Erbakan University Konya Türkiye.
Dane DeemerWhistler Center for Carbohydrate Research, Department of Food Science Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA.
Stephen R LindemannWhistler Center for Carbohydrate Research, Department of Food Science Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA.
Yunus E TunçilFood Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty Necmettin Erbakan University Konya Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9421-2332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative flours can reveal beneficial health effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of dietary fibers (DFs) of coconut and carob flours on colonic microbiota compositions and function. Coconut flour DFs were found to be dominated by mannose-containing polysaccharides by gas chromatography (GC)/MS and spectrophotometer, whereas glucose and uronic acid were the main monosaccharide moieties in carob flour DFs. In vitro fecal fermentation analysis revealed that coconut flour DFs result in the generation of microbial butyrate as much as inulin does, which is known to be a butyrogenic prebiotic, but at a slower rate. Supportingly, coconut flour DFs promoted butyrate-producing bacteria including

Indexed as

16S rRNAalternative flourscolonic microbiotafecal fermentationgluten free flourshort‐chain fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID39867837
PMCPMC11762452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.