ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Clinical efficacy of bladder function training combined with pelvic floor biofeedback electrical stimulation on neurogenic bladder and its impact on urodynamics.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neurogenic Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions Across Neurological Disorders: Mechanisms, Phenotypes, and Precision Rehabilitation Pathways-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of bladder function training combined with pelvic floor biofeedback electrical stimulation in the treatment of neurogenic bladder and its impact on urodynamics. Methods: This was a clinical comparative study. A total of 120 patients with neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury admitted to Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital of Capital Medical University and Beijing Shijingshan Hospital from January 2023 to December 2023 were randomly divided into two groups (n= 60/group). The study group treated with bladder function training combined with pelvic floor biofeedback electrical stimulation and the control group receiving conventional treatment and bladder function training. The differences in the clinical efficacy, voiding diary, voiding symptom score, urodynamics parameters, etc. were between the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: The difference of the efficacy in the study and control groups was statistically significant(p=0.02). After treatment, the study group showed significant improvement compared to the control group in terms of daily mean voiding frequency, daily mean single urine volume, daily maximum single urine volume, and catheterization frequency(P=0.00). Meanwhile, the study group also saw significantly lower residual urine volume (RUV) than the control group, with statistically significant differences(p=0.00), while MBC, Qmax, and BP were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group, with statistically significant differences(p=0.00). Conclusion: The application of bladder function training combined with pelvic floor biofeedback electrical stimulation is significantly effective for treating neurogenic bladder, which can significantly improve the storage and voiding functions of patients, alleviate lower urinary tract symptoms, and improve patients' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.