ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Prophylactic vs therapeutic blood transfusions impact on pregnant sickle cell patients.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To observe the fetomaternal outcome of therapeutic versus prophylactic blood transfusions in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) during pregnancy. Method: This single-center retrospective observational study was conducted on consecutive pregnant women with SCD between January 2018 and December 2020. All the pregnant women with SCD were included in this study. Sickler women carrying sickle cell traits (HbAS, HbAC), multiple pregnancy, or other medical diseases were excluded from the study. We used non-random, convenience sampling and collected their demographic details, medical history, course of SCD before & during pregnancy, maternal/fetal outcome, laboratory parameters, and other information using the questionnaire. Patients were sub-grouped into three according to blood transfusion categories (therapeutic, prophylactic, or not transfused) during the pregnancy. Descriptive data were represented as numbers and mean ± SD values. The medical and obstetrical complications and fetomaternal outcomes among the three groups were analyzed by Chi-square/Fisher's Extract test. Results: The study included 62 patients, 37 were in the therapeutic group, 11 were in the prophylactic group, and 14 were in the non-transfusion group. Hemolytic crises, painful crises, acute chest syndrome, pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), preeclampsia, preterm births, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), and neonatal ICU admission were significantly lower among the prophylactic group (P = 0.000, p = 0.000, p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.009, p = 0.007, p =0.001 & p= 0.016 respectively) compared with other two groups. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that prophylactic blood transfusion in SCD positively alters the course of pregnancy by reducing fetomaternal complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.