ArticleExtreme Mechanics Letters2025
Characterization of 3D printed micro-blades for cutting tissue-embedding material.
Article in Extreme Mechanics Letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-Tiered µDicer Enables Protein-Preserving Microdissection at 10 µm Resolution.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cutting soft materials on the microscale has emerging applications in single-cell studies, tissue microdissection for organoid culture, drug screens, and other analyses. However, the cutting process is complex and remains incompletely understood. Furthermore, precise control over blade geometries, such as the blade tip radius, has been difficult to achieve. In this work, we use the Nanoscribe 3D printer to precisely fabricate micro-blades (i.e., blades <1 mm in length) and blade grid geometries. This fabrication method enables a systematic study of the effect of blade geometry on the indentation cutting of paraffin wax, a common tissue-embedding material. First, we print straight micro-blades with tip radius ranging from ~100 nm to 10 μm. The micro-blades are mounted in a custom nanoindentation setup to measure the cutting energy during indentation cutting of paraffin. Cutting energy, measured as the difference in dissipated energy between the first and second loading cycles, decreases as blade tip radius decreases, until ~357 nm when the cutting energy plateaus despite further decrease in tip radius. Second, we expand our method to blades printed in unconventional configurations, including parallel blade structures and blades arranged in a square grid. Under the conditions tested, the cutting energy scales approximately linearly with the total length of the blades comprising the blade structure. The experimental platform described can be extended to investigate other blade geometries and guide the design of microscale cutting of soft materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.