ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Demographic, anthropometric and intrasubject variations affect platelet-rich plasma formulation.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Intraosseous platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis: a comprehensive review.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Association Between Body Mass Index and the Composition of Leucocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma: Implications for Personalized Approaches in Musculoskeletal Medicine.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Between Promise and Proof: Evaluating PRP's Role in Modern Gynecology.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Demographic, anthropometric and intrasubject variations affect platelet-rich plasma formulation.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Mean Platelet Volume in Blood vs. Platelet-Rich Plasma: Demographic Analysis and Intrasubject Variability in PRP Therapy.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the inter- and intra-individual differences in the platelet concentration between blood and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation, assess intersubject differences considering demographic and anthropometric variables, describe PRP code distribution and analyse intrasubject variability. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using a single-centre patient database from November 2021 to November 2023. It included patients with musculoskeletal pathologies treated with PRP injections. Primary variables were demographic characteristics (sex, age, body mass index [BMI]) and platelet concentrations in blood and PRP during treatments. Secondary analysis focused on PRP code frequency distribution and intrasubject variability according to different coding systems. Results: Here, 686 patients met the inclusion criteria. PRP exhibited significantly higher platelet concentrations compared to blood (378.01 ± 136.25 × 10 Conclusion: Age, gender, BMI and intrasubject variations significantly affect PRP formulation, emphasizing the importance of addressing these variables for a more predictable, personalized and effective therapeutic approach. Level of Evidence: This is a retrospective study. Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.