Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867675›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Cartilage thickness can be accurately measured intraoperatively in total knee arthroplasty: A step further in calipered kinematic alignment.

Giancarlo Giurazza, Stefano Campi, Michael T Hirschmann, Edoardo Franceschetti, Andrea Tanzilli, Pietro Gregori, Michele Paciotti, Biagio Zampogna, Rocco Papalia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Increased prevalence and severity of femoral bone wear in Japanese patients with varus knee osteoarthritis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giancarlo GiurazzaDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4385-6813
Stefano CampiDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.
Michael T HirschmannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Kantonsspital Baselland (Bruderholz, Liestal, Laufen) Bruderholz Switzerland.
Edoardo FranceschettiDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.
Andrea TanzilliDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.
Pietro GregoriDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0727-2231
Michele PaciottiDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.
Biagio ZampognaDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.
Rocco PapaliaDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is by definition a pure femoral resurfacing procedure aiming to restore the individual prearthritic anatomy. However, when a 2 mm compensation is systematically used on the worn side, the variability in cartilage thickness in the unworn compartment might alter the accuracy of the technique. This study aimed to validate two intraoperative femoral cartilage thickness measurement techniques by comparing them to the photographic method, which measures cartilage thickness through pixel analysis of bone-cut images. The study hypothesized that the two intraoperative methods are comparable and similarly accurate within 0.5 mm of the photographic method. Methods: Seventy cartilage thickness measurements from seventy patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis were prospectively collected. Two intraoperative techniques were evaluated: the electrocautery tip method (Method A) and the ruler method (Method B), performed before and after distal femoral bone resections, respectively. The postoperative photographic analysis (Method C) served as the reference method. Measurements were rounded to the nearest 0.5 mm for consistency. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Spearman's rank correlation, percentage of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: No significant differences were observed between Method A and Method B in measuring femoral cartilage thickness. Agreement with Method C was 100% for Method B and 85% for Method A. In the 15% of discordant cases, Method A overestimated the measurements by one category of 0.5 mm compared to Method C. Correlation coefficients between the methods were high ( Discussion: Both intraoperative methods are reliable and comparable to the photographic method when rounded to the closest 0.5 mm, with no significant differences among them. The electrocautery method has the added advantage of measuring cartilage thickness before bone cuts are performed. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Indexed as

cartilage thickness measurementelectrocautery tip methodintraoperative techniqueskinematic alignment (KA)total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Identifiers

PMID39867675
PMCPMC11763056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.