ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
Tranexamic acid use in rotator cuff repair: A systematic review of perioperative outcomes.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tranexamic acid in shoulder surgery: a narrative review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Tranexamic Acid in Lower Extremity Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Oncologic Indications: A Retrospective Comparative Study of 617 Patients.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- The impact of tranexamic acid on surgical efficiency and visualization in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Article
- Intravenous tranexamic acid shows limited efficacy in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.EFORT open reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) use has become the gold standard in total joint arthroplasty to limit intraoperative blood loss and transfusion rates. More recently, the indications for TXA have expanded to knee and shoulder arthroscopy with promising early results. However, the effectiveness of TXA during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate perioperative outcomes following the use of TXA during RCR. Methods: A systematic review was performed via the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases in November 2024. Studies were assessed for quality of visual clarity, operative time, mean arterial pressure (MAP), volume of arthroscopy irrigation used, arthroscopic pump pressure, and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 12 clinical trials involving 999 patients were included. 9 studies reported on visual clarity and 6 of these reported improvements in visual clarity with TXA administration. Four studies reported improvements in postoperative pain, however outcomes varied greatly depending on when follow-up assessment occurred. A majority of studies did not report differences in operative time, irrigation volume, or postoperative swelling. There were no venous thromboembolism events reported in the included studies. Conclusion: TXA dosing during RCR surgery may improve visual clarity, however its effect on other perioperative outcomes remains unclear. Level of evidence: Level I.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.