Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867644›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2024

A novel machine learning based framework for developing composite digital biomarkers of disease progression.

Song Zhai, Andy Liaw, Judong Shen, Yuting Xu, Vladimir Svetnik, James J FitzGerald, Chrystalina A Antoniades, Dan Holder, Marissa F Dockendorf, Jie Ren and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Song ZhaiBiostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Andy LiawBiostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Judong ShenBiostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Yuting XuBiostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Vladimir SvetnikBiostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
James J FitzGeraldNeuroMetrology Lab, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Chrystalina A AntoniadesNeuroMetrology Lab, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dan HolderBiostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Marissa F DockendorfDigital Clinical Measures, Translational Medicine, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Jie RenDigital Clinical Measures, Translational Medicine, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Richard BaumgartnerBiostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current methods of measuring disease progression of neurodegenerative disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD), largely rely on composite clinical rating scales, which are prone to subjective biases and lack the sensitivity to detect progression signals in a timely manner. Digital health technology (DHT)-derived measures offer potential solutions to provide objective, precise, and sensitive measures that address these limitations. However, the complexity of DHT datasets and the potential to derive numerous digital features that were not previously possible to measure pose challenges, including in selection of the most important digital features and construction of composite digital biomarkers. Methods: We present a comprehensive machine learning based framework to construct composite digital biomarkers for progression tracking. This framework consists of a marginal (univariate) digital feature screening, a univariate association test, digital feature selection, and subsequent construction of composite (multivariate) digital disease progression biomarkers using Penalized Generalized Estimating Equations (PGEE). As an illustrative example, we applied this framework to data collected from a PD longitudinal observational study. The data consisted of Opal™ sensor-based movement measurements and MDS-UPDRS Part III scores collected at 3-month intervals for 2 years in 30 PD and 10 healthy control participants. Results: In our illustrative example, 77 out of 235 digital features from the study passed univariate feature screening, with 11 features selected by PGEE to include in construction of the composite digital measure. Compared to MDS-UPDRS Part III, the composite digital measure exhibited a smoother and more significant increasing trend over time in PD groups with less variability, indicating improved ability for tracking disease progression. This composite digital measure also demonstrated the ability to classify between Conclusion: Measures from DHTs show promise in tracking neurodegenerative disease progression with increased sensitivity and reduced variability as compared to traditional clinical scores. Herein, we present a novel framework and methodology to construct composite digital measure of disease progression from high-dimensional DHT datasets, which may have utility in accelerating the development and application of composite digital biomarkers in drug development.

Indexed as

composite digital biomarkerdisease progressionlinear mixed effects modelmachine learningParkinson's diseasepenalized generalized estimating equations

Identifiers

PMID39867644
PMCPMC11760596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.