Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867613›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2025

Comparison of three different in vitro digestion methods for carbohydrates.

Yahao Xiao, Sheng Li, Jiaxi Li, Yanlan Bi, Xuebing Xu, Hong Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yahao XiaoCollege of Food Science and Technology, Henan University of Technology, Lianhua Road, Zhengzhou, 450001 China.
Sheng LiWilmar Biotechnology Research and Development Center, Shanghai) Co., Ltd, 118 Gaodong Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200137 China.
Jiaxi LiCollege of Food Science and Technology, Henan University of Technology, Lianhua Road, Zhengzhou, 450001 China.
Yanlan BiCollege of Food Science and Technology, Henan University of Technology, Lianhua Road, Zhengzhou, 450001 China.
Xuebing XuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Henan University of Technology, Lianhua Road, Zhengzhou, 450001 China.
Hong ZhangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Henan University of Technology, Lianhua Road, Zhengzhou, 450001 China.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-8696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spectrophotometer method, ELISA, and High-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) method have been widely used to quantify and characterize the glucose released from rice after in vitro digestion. Despite this, the results of the three methods may not be comparable. This work investigated the limitation of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) of the glucose released after in vitro rice digestion. Intra-day and inter-day precision were evaluated through analyzing the contents of rapidly digestible starch (RDS), DS (RDS + slowly digestible starch (SDS)), and total starch (TS). Tests of accuracies were also conducted. The results demonstrated that all three methods showed good linear correlations, i.e., y = 0.3417x + 0.0799 (r

Indexed as

Carbohydrate digestibilityELISAHPAEC-PADSpectrophotometer

Identifiers

PMID39867613
PMCPMC11754772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.