ReviewJournal of food science and technology2025
An insight into the applications of bacteriophages against food-borne pathogens.
Review in Journal of food science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From laboratory to clinical application: a narrative review of bacteriophage therapy for antimicrobial-resistant infections in veterinary medicine.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
- Targeting Foodborne Pathogens with Bacteriophages: Mechanisms, Applications, and Resistance.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Characterization, genomic insights and anti-biofilm potential of phage vB_PaeM_PKMS3, a lytic Pbunavirus capable of infecting clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel and emerging pathogens, enduring contamination, antibiotic resistance, an environment that is always changing, and the complexity of food production systems all contribute to the worsening of foodborne illness. It has been proposed that bacteriophages can serve as both fast food-borne pathogen detection tools and natural food preservatives in a variety of foods. Phages, like many other antimicrobial interventions used in food production systems, are not a cure-all for issues related to food safety, though. Consequently, phage-based biocontrol has a generally narrower antibacterial spectrum than most antibiotics, even though it can be promising in the fight against foodborne infections. Among the difficulties phage-based biocontrol techniques encounter are forming phage-insensitive single-cell variations and creating potent cocktails. To better understand when and where phage-based applications can be successfully implemented at the production and processing levels, this review focuses on phage-based applications at crucial control points in food production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.