Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867526›Full record

ReviewPerspectives in clinical research

A comprehensive review of challenges and opportunities for stem cell research in India.

Kavita Srivastava, Lily Srivastava, Tanvi Jain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kavita SrivastavaFaculty of Biotechnology, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University , Barabanki, UP, India.
Lily SrivastavaDepartment of Law, Sri J.N.M.P.G College, Associated College of Lucknow University, Lucknow, UP, India.
Tanvi JainFaculty of Biotechnology, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University , Barabanki, UP, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell research is a major focus for scientific and medical communities worldwide due to the potential for stem cells to restore function lost due to disease, trauma, congenital abnormalities, and aging. Stem cells can repair, replace, or regenerate damaged cells, tissues, or organs, making them an important area of research in regenerative medicine. India is emerging as a prominent hub for the development of stem cell therapy (SCT), and it is important to assess the current state of stem cell research in India and the potential for advancement to promote stem cell-based therapy. However, several barriers exist in India that are hindering the rapid expansion of SCT. This article examines the existing regulations that govern SCT in India, comparing them with regulations in developed nations, particularly for patients with unmet clinical needs. It also highlights the importance of public education in dispelling myths, addressing concerns, and promoting the benefits of stem cell research. The article concludes with recommendations for enhancing safety measures in SCT applications to ensure ethical practices and patient well-being.

Indexed as

Developed nationsregenerative medicinestem cellunmet clinical need

Identifiers

PMID39867526
PMCPMC11759228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.