Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867515›Full record

ReviewToxicology reports2025

Biogenic nanoparticles as a promising drug delivery system.

Rehab M Abdel-Megeed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Biogenic FeApplied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rehab M Abdel-MegeedTherapeutic Chemistry Department, National Research Center, El Buhouth St., Dokki, Cairo 12622, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology has significantly influenced the worldwide medical services sector during the past few decades. Biological collection approaches for nanoparticles are economical, non-toxic, and ecologically benign. This review provides up-to-date information on nanoparticle production processes and biological sources, including algae, plants, bacteria, fungus, actinomycetes, and yeast. The biological technique of generating nanoparticles has advantages over chemical, physical, and biological methods, including low-toxicity and friendly to the environment, thereby providing a viable option for therapeutic applications as s promising drug delivery system. In addition to aiding researchers, the bio-mediated, obtained nanoparticles also modify particles to promote both health and safety. We also looked at the important medicinal uses of nanoparticles, including their antifungal, antimicrobial, antiviral, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties. The current study highlights the findings of recent research in this field and discusses various methods proposed to describe the bio-mediated acquisition of novel nanoparticles.. The production of nanoparticles via biogenic sources possess various benefits, such as low cost, bioavailability, and environmental friendliness. In addition to the determination of the bioactive chemicals mediated by nanoparticle as well as the examination of the biochemical pathways and enzyme reactions. The major focus of this review is highlighting on the essential role of biogenic nanoparticles as promising drug delivery system.

Indexed as

Biogenic nanoparticlesBionanotechnologyDrug Delivery system

Identifiers

PMID39867515
PMCPMC11762933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.