Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867504›Full record

ArticleInsecta mundi2023

Descriptions of one hundred new species of Hesperiidae.

Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Nick V Grishin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insecta mundi, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Notable Hesperiidae collected by Kilian Roever in Arizona, USA.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2025
    Article
  2. Update to: Advancing butterfly systematics through genomic analysis.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2025
    Article
  3. New butterfly taxa and findings from genomic analyses.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. New taxa of butterflies supported by genomic analysis.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2024
    Article
  7. Taxonomic advances driven by the genomic analysis of butterflies.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jing ZhangEugene McDermott Center for Human Growth and Development and Department of Biophysics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-8816 USA.
Qian CongEugene McDermott Center for Human Growth and Development and Department of Biophysics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-8816 USA.
Nick V GrishinDepartments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9050 USA.

Funding

Computational analysis of proteinsR35GM127390 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GRISHIN, NICK V. · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A century and a half since the time of Hewitson, we are experiencing a renaissance in species discovery fueled by whole genome sequencing. A large-scale genomic analysis of Hesperiidae Latreille, 1809 (Lepidoptera), including primary type specimens, reveals a deluge of species new to science. One hundred of them (one in a new genus) are described here from the New World (type localities are given in parenthesis):

Indexed as

biodiversityCryptic speciesgenomicsnomenclatureskipper butterfliesspeciationtaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID39867504
PMCPMC11759504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.