ArticlePopulation research and policy review2023
Population-Wide Vaccination Hesitancy among the Amish: A County-Level Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Adoption and Implications for Public Health Policy and Practice.
Article in Population research and policy review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Authority, trust, and healthcare communication in a religious minority: the case of the Haredi community in Israel during COVID-19.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Environmental investigation of a hepatitis A outbreak associated with spring water consumption in an Anabaptist community: Kentucky, 2018-2019.Journal of water and health · 2026Article
- Religious Traditions Exhibit Heterogeneous Effects on Vaccination Uptake: A U.S. County-Level Regression Analysis Supporting Tailored Health Outreach.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatially concentrated, vaccine-hesitant populations represent an ongoing challenge to public health policies that emphasize mass vaccination as a means to eradicating certain infectious diseases. Previous research suggests that Amish populations, which are spatially clustered and rapidly growing, may be undervaccinated. However, existing evidence is limited to local case studies in pre-COVID-19 contexts. Using a series of negative binomial regression models, we evaluated the association between county-level vaccination rates and the percentage of Amish in 356 Amish-populated counties in the United States from February 1, 2021 through October 31, 2022 while controlling for a set of covariates known to impact vaccination rates. Our findings suggest that, after adjusting for county-level characteristics, Amish-populated counties had approximately 1.6% (95% CI: 1.1%-2.0%; p < 0.001) lower rates of getting COVID-19 vaccines. Our findings underscore the failure of public health outreach efforts to convince Amish to accept COVID-19 vaccines. Prevailing public representations of the Amish-as an unproblematic people removed from public affairs and largely unaware of the "outside world"-may have helped Amish avoid societal pressure to vaccinate. Furthermore, because Amish are not as much "hard to reach" as "hard to vaccinate," we suggest service providers and policymakers avoid top-down approaches that target the Amish-including cultural competency strategies that work to reduce perceived boundaries-and instead give Amish space to either initiate bottom-up partnerships with health services or accept responsibility for undervaccination in public life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.