Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867473›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Polysorbates degrading enzymes in biotherapeutics - a current status and future perspectives.

Marius Nicolaus Felix, Thomas Waerner, Daniel Lakatos, Bernd Reisinger, Simon Fischer, Patrick Garidel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marius Nicolaus FelixAnalytical Development Biologicals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG, Innovation Unit, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Thomas WaernerAnalytical Development Biologicals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG, Innovation Unit, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Daniel LakatosBioprocess Development Biologicals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG, Innovation Unit, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Bernd ReisingerAnalytical Development Biologicals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG, Innovation Unit, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Simon FischerBioprocess Development Biologicals, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG, Innovation Unit, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Patrick GaridelPharmaceutical Development Biologicals, TIP, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG, Innovation Unit, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polysorbates, in particular polysorbate (PS) 20 and 80, are the most commonly used surfactants for stabilising biotherapeutics produced by biotechnological processes. PSs are derived from ethoxylated sorbitan (a derivative of sorbitol) esterified with fatty acids of varying chain length and degree of saturation. In the past, these surfactants have been reported to have specific liabilities. Chemical (oxidations and hydrolyses) and enzymatic degradations have been reported to affect the stability of PS in drug products. Specifically, the presence of trace amounts (sub-ppm) of certain host cell proteins (HCPs) can induce enzymatic PS degradation, which can lead to the release of free fatty acids during storage over time. Enzymatic polysorbate degradation may impair the functionality of the surfactant in stabilising therapeutic proteins, leading to the formation of visible and/or sub-visible particles in biopharmaceutical drug products. This review summarises the enzymes currently known to be involved in the degradation of polysorbate in mammalian biotechnological processes for therapeutic proteins. In recent years, advanced analytical methods have been developed to qualify and quantify the PS-degrading enzymes. Most of these assays are based on mass spectrometry with a preceding HCP enrichment approach. Efforts were made to measure the enzyme activity and correlate it with observed PS degradation. The impact on drug product quality attributes, including fatty acid solubility and phase separation, up to the formation of visible particles, and the potential induction of protein and protein/fatty acid mixed particles as well as the sensitivity of specific PS quality towards enzymatic degradation, was considered. Various drug substance (DS) mitigation strategies related to the occurrence of PS degrading enzymes are discussed as amongst them the generation of stable HCP knockout cell lines, which are also carefully analysed. The underlying opinion article reflects the undergoing discussions related to PS degrading enzymes and focusses on (i) impact on drug product, (ii) analytics for identification/quantification (characterisation) of the PS degrading enzymes, (iii) enzyme activity (iv) currently identified enzymes, and (v) potential mitigation strategies to avoid enzymatic PS degradation during DS manufacturing.

Indexed as

biotherapeuticsenzymatic degradationfatty acidsHCPmass spectrometryparticle formationpolysorbatetween

Identifiers

PMID39867473
PMCPMC11760601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.