ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025
Liver fibrosis classification on trichrome histology slides using weakly supervised learning in children and young adults.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Unified Histopathological Framework of Liver Fibrogenesis in Chronic Viral Hepatitis B, C and Coinfection.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence‑based quantitative analysis of hepatic fibrosis in carbon tetrachloride-induced mouse model of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis.Toxicological research · 2026Article
- Development of a lightweight deep learning model for accurate assessment of liver fibrosis in biliary atresia.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- MMD-Net: a weakly supervised solution for quantification of nonalcoholic fatty liver biopsies.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Engineering a GelMA-dECM-based 3D bioprinted liver fibrosis model: methotrexate-induced functional and molecular validation.RSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Traditional liver fibrosis staging via percutaneous biopsy suffers from sampling bias and variable inter-pathologist agreement, highlighting the need for more objective techniques. Deep learning models for disease staging from medical images have shown potential to decrease diagnostic variability, with recent weakly supervised learning strategies showing promising results even with limited manual annotation. Purpose: To study the clustering-constrained attention multiple instance learning (CLAM) approach for staging liver fibrosis on trichrome whole slide images (WSIs) of children and young adults. Methods: This is an ethics board approved retrospective study utilizing 217 trichrome WSI from pediatric liver biopsies for model development and testing. Two pediatric pathologists scored WSI using two liver fibrosis staging systems, METAVIR and Ishak. Cases were then secondarily categorized into either high- or low-stage liver fibrosis and used for model development. The CLAM pipeline was used to develop binary classification models for histological liver fibrosis. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's Kappa. Results: The CLAM models showed strong diagnostic performance, with sensitivities up to 0.76 and AUCs up to 0.92 for distinguishing low- and high-stage fibrosis. The agreement between model predictions and average pathologist scores was moderate to substantial (Kappa: 0.57-0.69), whereas pathologist agreement on the METAVIR and Ishak scoring systems was only fair (Kappa: 0.39-0.46). Conclusions: CLAM pipeline showed promise in detecting features important for differentiating low- and high-stage fibrosis from trichrome WSI based on the results, offering a promising objective method for liver fibrosis detection in children and young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.