Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867452›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Noise reduction in brain magnetic resonance imaging using adaptive wavelet thresholding based on linear prediction factor.

Ananias Pereira Neto, Fabrício J B Barros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. DetectingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ananias Pereira NetoFederal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Pará - IFPA, Belém, Brazil.
Fabrício J B BarrosGraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Pará - UFPA, Belém, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Wavelet thresholding techniques are crucial in mitigating noise in data communication and storage systems. In image processing, particularly in medical imaging like MRI, noise reduction is vital for improving visual quality and accurate analysis. While existing methods offer noise reduction, they often suffer from limitations like edge and texture loss, poor smoothness, and the need for manual parameter tuning. Methods: This study introduces a novel adaptive wavelet thresholding technique for noise reduction in brain MRI. The proposed method utilizes a linear prediction factor to adjust the threshold adaptively. This factor leverages temporal information and features from both the original and noisy images to determine a weighted threshold. This dynamic thresholding approach aims to selectively reduce or eliminate noise coefficients while preserving essential image features. Results: The proposed method was rigorously evaluated against existing state-of-the-art noise reduction techniques. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvements in key performance metrics, including mean squared error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity index (SSIM). Discussion: The proposed adaptive thresholding technique effectively addresses the limitations of existing methods by providing a more efficient and accurate noise reduction approach. By dynamically adjusting the threshold based on image-specific characteristics, this method effectively preserves image details while effectively suppressing noise. These findings highlight the potential of the proposed method for enhancing the quality and interpretability of brain MRI images.

Indexed as

adaptive thresholdingimage noise reductionMSEPSNRSSIMwavelet thresholdingwavelet transform

Identifiers

PMID39867452
PMCPMC11757293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.