Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867382›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Prediction-powered Inference for Clinical Trials: application to linear covariate adjustment.

Pierre-Emmanuel Poulet, Maylis Tran, Sophie Tezenas du Montcel, Bruno Dubois, Stanley Durrleman, Bruno Jedynak

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pierre-Emmanuel PouletARAMIS, Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM Institut du Cerveau), INRIA, INSERM, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4423-2749
Maylis TranARAMIS, Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM Institut du Cerveau), INRIA, INSERM, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0009-0006-8150-9512
Sophie Tezenas du MontcelARAMIS, Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM Institut du Cerveau), INRIA, INSERM, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2866-4330
Bruno DuboisARAMIS, Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM Institut du Cerveau), INRIA, INSERM, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Stanley DurrlemanARAMIS, Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM Institut du Cerveau), INRIA, INSERM, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9450-6920
Bruno JedynakARAMIS, Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM Institut du Cerveau), INRIA, INSERM, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0824-5745

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention: Sex Differences in DNA MethylationR01AG027161 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Nathaniel Ark Chin, Sterling C Johnson · 2007 to 2026
$35.6M
The Longitudinal Course of Neural Function and Amyloid in People At Risk for ADR01AG021155 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sterling C Johnson · 2004 to 2026
$27.0M
OCT and OCTA image processing for retinal assessment of people with MSR01EY032284 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PRINCE, JERRY L · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032284NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021155NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027161NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction-powered inference (PPI) [1] and its subsequent development called PPI++ [2] provide a novel approach to standard statistical estimation, leveraging machine learning systems, to enhance unlabeled data with predictions. We use this paradigm in clinical trials. The predictions are provided by disease progression models, providing prognostic scores for all the participants as a function of baseline covariates. The proposed method would empower clinical trials by providing untreated digital twins of the treated patients while remaining statistically valid. The potential implications of this new estimator of the treatment effect in a two-arm randomized clinical trial (RCT) are manifold. First, it leads to an overall reduction of the sample size required to reach the same power as a standard RCT. Secondly, it advocates for an imbalance of controls and treated patients, requiring fewer controls to achieve the same power. Finally, this technique directly transfers any disease prediction model trained on large cohorts to practical and scientifically valid use. In this paper, we demonstrate the theoretical properties of this estimator and illustrate them through simulations. We show that it is asymptotically unbiased for the Average Treatment Effect and derive an explicit formula for its variance. We then compare this estimator to a regression-based linear covariate adjustment method. An application to an Alzheimer's disease clinical trial showcases the potential to reduce the sample size.

Identifiers

PMID39867382
PMCPMC11759613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.