ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Differences in Ocular Biometry Between Short-Axial and Normal-Axial Eyes in the Elderly Japanese.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interocular agreement and differences of ocular growth in cataract patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Analysis of ocular biometry in Korean using swept-source optical coherence tomography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Among patients with angle-closure glaucoma, it is common to have a short-axial eye, which also makes it difficult to select an appropriate intraocular lens. Previous studies have focused on the ocular biometry of the long-axial eye, whereas only a few reports have focused on the short-axial eye. This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of the short-axial eye on ocular biometry among the elderly Japanese. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 142 patients who consulted at our hospital. The ocular axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), average anterior corneal radius of curvature (CR), white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens thickness (LT) were measured using OA-2000. The short-axial and normal-axial groups (short-axial [SA] and normal-axial [NA] groups) included those with an AL less than 22.5 mm and ranging from 22.5-26.5 mm, respectively. Comparisons between groups were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient tests and multiple regression analyses were performed for all parameters overall and per group. Results: The parameters that were significantly different between the SA and NA groups were CR, WTW, and ACD (all P < 0.0001). In the SA group (42 patients), only ACD was significantly correlated with AL (r = 0.33, P = 0.031). On multiple regression analysis for the SA group, none of the parameters had a significant effect on AL (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: In the SA group, ACD was the only factor that positively correlated with AL; it was significantly shallower than in the NA group. Thus, in the SA eye, it is clinically important to be aware of ACD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.