Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867334›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2025

Progress in research on organic photovoltaic acceptor materials.

Shijie Yuan, Wenzhen Luo, Mingfa Xie, Hongjian Peng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shijie YuanCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha Hunan 410083 China HongjianPeng@126.com.
Wenzhen LuoCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha Hunan 410083 China HongjianPeng@126.com.
Mingfa XieCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha Hunan 410083 China HongjianPeng@126.com.
Hongjian PengCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University Changsha Hunan 410083 China HongjianPeng@126.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2720-8237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past two decades, organic solar cells (OSCs) have begun to attract attention as the efficiency of inorganic solar cells gradually approaches the theoretical limit. In the early development stage of OSCs, p-type conjugated polymers and n-type fullerene derivatives were the most commonly used electron donors and acceptors. However, with further research, the shortcomings of fullerene materials have become increasingly apparent. In recent years, non-fullerene acceptor materials, including small molecules and polymers, have emerged as promising alternatives to fullerene derivatives. This review summarizes various types of acceptor materials in OSCs and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of each.

Identifiers

PMID39867334
PMCPMC11758790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.