ArticleAJOG global reports2025
Barriers and facilitators to telemedicine contraception among patients that speak Spanish: a qualitative study.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine contraception services have increased since the COVID-19 pandemic. There may be unique equity implications and language barriers for patients who speak Spanish. Objective: To identify the barriers and facilitators of telemedicine for contraception care among patients who speak Spanish using a community-based participatory research approach. Study Design: The study was designed and conducted in consultation with a community advisory board. We interviewed 20 patients after telemedicine and in-person contraception visits conducted in Spanish at Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest in Southern California between April 2022 and May 2023. Telemedicine visits were conducted by audio only. Two coders analyzed the data using thematic analysis. Results: The average age of the participants was 32.5 years old (range 19-45). Most participants had some college education (13/20, 65.0%) and public insurance (18/20, 90.0%). Most chose a short-acting contraceptive method (11/20, 55.0%). Five key themes were identified. (1) Participants reported less comfort with video technology and a preference to not be seen during the appointment, therefore preferring audio-only for telemedicine visits. (2) Participants did not report difficulty with Spanish interpreters using telemedicine. (3) Telemedicine has conveniences related to time, work, childcare, and transportation but may have inconveniences related to method receipt. (4) Preference for physical exam and preventative care and familiarity with the in-clinic model motivated people who sought in-person care rather than technology barriers with telemedicine. (5) There is trust in the privacy and confidentiality of the visits, but privacy at home for the individual may impact choice for in-person care. Conclusion: Among patients who speak Spanish, telemedicine contraception care was acceptable and had many conveniences. Many patients who speak Spanish preferred audio-only for telemedicine contraception visits. Use of interpreters and technology were not perceived barriers to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.