ArticleSudanese journal of paediatrics2024
Effect of a simulated patient cases software on the clinical competence of medical students during pediatric clerkship.
Article in Sudanese journal of paediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simulation in medical education improves clinical competence. The Diagnostic Clinical Reasoning Program (DxR), a web-based simulated patient cases software, augments students' clinical skills in a virtual hospital setting. In the Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain, it is used to train medical students before they begin the clinical clerkship. This study aims to assess the impact of using the DxR software during pediatric clerkship on the clinical skills of year-5 medical students. 186 fifth-year medical students attending the pediatric clerkship during the academic year 2018-2019 were enrolled in the study. The students were randomised into two equal groups with similar gender ratios. Both groups attend all the regular educational activities of the pediatric clerkship. The study group used the DxR software to study five simulated patients' scenarios and the control group examined five hospitalised patients and wrote their case write-ups. The scores obtained by the two groups in the written and clinical components of the pediatric end-of-clerkship examination were compared. The students in the study group obtained higher scores than the students in the control group in the objective structured clinical examination and the long case. The difference was statistically significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.