Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867247›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025

Effect of Lamotrigine on Refractory Epilepsy: Clinical Outcomes and EEG Changes.

Zheng Li, Peng Wu, Qiushuo Chen, Xinqiang Tong, Qichao Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zheng Li *Shijiazhuang Rongkang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Co., Ltd., Internal Medicine, Shijiazhuang, 050000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0003-7602-8982
Peng Wu *Shijiazhuang Rongkang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Co., Ltd., Internal Medicine, Shijiazhuang, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Qiushuo ChenDepartment of Neurology, Baoding First Central Hospital, Baoding, People's Republic of China.
Xinqiang TongShijiazhuang Rongkang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Co., Ltd., Internal Medicine, Shijiazhuang, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Qichao YangShijiazhuang Rongkang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Co., Ltd., Internal Medicine, Shijiazhuang, 050000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Refractory epilepsy poses significant challenges in clinical management due to its resistance to standard antiepileptic therapies, necessitating the exploration of more effective treatment regimens. Lamotrigine, with its proven efficacy and tolerability, offers potential benefits when combined with traditional medications like valproate, though its comprehensive impact on clinical outcomes and neurological markers requires further study. Objective: To analyze the improvement effect of combined application of lamotrigine on refractory epilepsy patients and its impact on patients' EEG and neurological function. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the clinical data of 93 patients with refractory epilepsy who were admitted to our hospital between January 2023 and June 2024. Based on the treatment interventions received, patients were divided into a control group (n=46, treated with valproate) and an observation group (n=47, treated with lamotrigine in addition to valproate). The clinical treatment effects, EEG (δ, θ, α, β) power levels, neurological function indicators [brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), pro-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, Bax], inflammatory response indicators [interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)], and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results: The clinical treatment effect in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group, with a higher total effective rate (93.62% vs 76.09%, P<0.05). The monthly seizure frequency was significantly reduced in both groups after treatment (P < 0.05). The observation group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in seizure frequency compared to the control group (P = 0.014). Regarding EEG power levels, both groups showed decreases in δ and θ power levels and increases in α and β power levels after treatment, with the observation group exhibiting more pronounced changes (P<0.05). Neurological function indicators revealed that Bcl-2 levels decreased, while BDNF, NGF, and Bax levels increased in both groups after treatment, with the observation group showing more significant improvements (P<0.05). Similarly, inflammatory response indicators, including IL-1β, IL-6, and PGE2, decreased in both groups, with the observation group demonstrating greater reductions (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was comparable between the two groups, with no significant difference observed (23.40% vs 17.39%, P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared to valproate treatment alone, the combined application of lamotrigine can further enhance the efficacy in refractory epilepsy patients, Lower the seizure frequency, improve EEG power levels and neurological function, reduce inflammatory responses, and does not increase the risk of related adverse reactions.

Indexed as

EEGefficacyimpactinflammatory responselamotrigineneurological functionrefractory epilepsyvalproate

Identifiers

PMID39867247
PMCPMC11761849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.