ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Ventricular Depolarization Abnormalities and Their Role in Cardiac Risk Stratification - A Narrative Review.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventricular depolarization refers to the electrical activation and subsequent contraction of the ventricles, visible as the QRS complex on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). A well-organized and efficient depolarization is critical for cardiac function. Abnormalities in ventricular depolarization may indicate various pathologies and can be present in all leads if the condition is general, or in a subgroup of anatomically contiguous leads if the condition is limited to the corresponding anatomic location of the heart. Furthermore, the assessment of depolarization abnormalities on the ECG may either be identified visually or this may depend on further processing. In recent decades, assessment of depolarization abnormalities has received a lot of attention for cardiac risk stratification. This risk stratification aims to identify patients at high risk of adverse cardiac events, to tailor preventive or therapeutic interventions. In this review, we provide an oversight of different techniques for assessing abnormal ventricular depolarization and their value in diagnosing certain conditions, in risk stratification of adverse events, and in guiding therapeutic decisions. This includes QRS alterations directly corresponding to cardiac conditions, such as bundle branch blocks, or the presence of a delta wave, and also metrics aiming to qualitatively or quantitatively assess myocardial scarring, such as QRS (micro)fragmentation and QRS-scoring, and techniques assessing abnormal late depolarizations, such as signal-averaged ECG. While most established assessments of abnormal depolarization rely on human interpretation and are limited by visual detection, recently introduced analyses, such as QRS micro-fragmentation, aim to tackle these limitations. Besides eliminating bias, these automated analyses bypass the need for human interpretation, thereby paving the way for large population studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.