Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867185›Full record

SynthesisReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Primary Care Health Checks at Assessing Cardiovascular Risks among Ethnic Minorities in the UK: A Systematic Review.

Aleesha Karia, Reza Zamani, Tanimola Martins, Abdal Zafar, Ava Zamani

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aleesha KariaMedical School, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, EX1 2LU Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3877-1954
Reza ZamaniMedical School, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, EX1 2LU Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3144-4846
Tanimola MartinsMedical School, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, EX1 2LU Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5226-4073
Abdal ZafarDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, The Royal London Hospital, E1 1FR London, UK.
Ava ZamaniDepartment of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, EC1A 7BE London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) affect around 7.6 million people in the UK, disproportionately affecting the minority ethnic community. In 2009, the UK's National Health Service (NHS) launched a Health Check (NHSHC) scheme to improve early diagnosis of various clinical conditions, including CVD, by screening patients for associated risk factors. This systematic review investigated the engagement of minority ethnic groups with these services. Methods: Seven studies identified patient demographics of NHSHC attendees using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic And Meta Analysis-Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines and accessing Ovid (MEDLINE), PubMed and Web of Science databases. Results: The screening was either by invitation or opportunistic at other appointments with their doctor. Engagement with the service was highest among the South Asian patients (21%-68%), but lowest amongst Chinese patients (12%-61%). Further, engagement was lower among those screened following a formal invitation than those seen opportunistically. However, a greater proportion of patients were screened opportunistically than by invitation. Conclusions: Overall, we found that the NHSHC is not being utilised adequately for all patients at high risk of CVD, particularly White and Chinese patients. It highlights the critical role of primary care could play to improve patient engagement with the service.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseaseethnic minoritiesNHS health checkpreventionprimary care

Identifiers

PMID39867185
PMCPMC11759957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.