ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Long-Term Net Adverse Clinical Events in High Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05369442 (Prognosis and Antiplatelet Strategies for Patients With PCI and High Bleeding Risk), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prognosis and Antiplatelet Strategies for Patients With PCI and High Bleeding Risk:A Study Protocol
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with a high risk of bleeding undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI-HBR) were provided consensus-based criteria by the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR). However, the prognostic predictors in this group of patients have yet to be fully explored. Thus, an effective prognostic prediction model for PCI-HBR patients is required. Methods: We prospectively enrolled PCI-HBR patients from May 2022 to April 2024 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The cohort was randomly divided into training and internal validation sets in a ratio of 7:3. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm was employed to select variables in the training set. Subsequently, a prediction model for 1-year net adverse clinical events (NACEs)-free survival was developed using a multivariable Cox regression model, and a nomogram was constructed. The outcome of the NACEs is defined as a composite endpoint that includes death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) grade 3-5 major bleeding. Validation was conducted exclusively using the internal validation cohort, assessing the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the nomogram. Results: This study included 1512 patients with PCI-HBR, including 1058 in the derivation cohort and 454 in the validation cohort. We revealed five risk factors after LASSO regression, Cox regression, and clinical significance screening. These were then utilized to construct a prognostic prediction nomogram, including chronic kidney disease, left main stem lesion, multivessel disease, triglycerides (TG), and creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB). The nomogram exhibited strong predictive ability (the area under the curve (AUC) to predict 1-year NACE-free survival was 0.728), displaying favorable levels of accuracy, discrimination, and clinical usefulness in the internal validation cohort. Conclusions: This study presents a nomogram to predict 1-year NACE outcomes in PCI-HBR patients. Internal validation showed strong predictive capability and clinical utility. Future research should validate the nomogram in diverse populations and explore new predictors for improved accuracy. Clinical Trial Registration: The data for this study were obtained from the PPP-PCI registry, NCT05369442 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05369442).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.