ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Recent Developments in Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence on Clinical Outcomes and Surgical Approaches.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Silicon Nitride Coatings on Titanium for Cardiovascular Applications: Interface Engineering, Hemocompatibility, and Translational Challenges.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cardiac Rehabilitation After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- From innovation to implementation: expanding global access to mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolution of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) from large, pulsatile systems to compact, continuous-flow pumps has significantly improved implantation outcomes and patient mobility. Minimally invasive surgical techniques have emerged that offer reduced morbidity and enhanced recovery for LVAD recipients. Innovations in wireless power transfer technologies aim to mitigate driveline-related complications, enhancing patient safety and quality of life. Pediatric ventricular assist devices (VADs) remain a critical unmet need; challenges in developing pediatric VADs include device sizing and managing congenital heart disease. Advances in LVAD technology adapted for use in right ventricular assist devices (RVADs) make possible the effective management of right ventricular failure in patients with acute cardiac conditions or congenital heart defects. To address disparities in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) access, cost-effective VAD designs have been developed internationally. The Vitalmex device from Mexico City combines pulsatile-flow technology with a paracorporeal design, utilizing cost-effective materials like silicone-elastic and titanium, and features a reusable pump housing to minimize manufacturing and operational costs. Romanian researchers have used advanced mathematical modeling and three-dimensional (3D) printing to produce a rim-driven, hubless axial-flow pump, achieving efficient blood flow with a compact design that includes a wireless power supply to reduce infection risk. In conclusion, MCS continues to advance with technological innovation and global collaboration. Ongoing efforts are essential to optimize outcomes, expand indications, and improve access to life-saving therapies worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.