Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867142›Full record

ArticleJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2025

Validation of SCAI Shock Staging in Critically Ill Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Osama Mukhtar, Amos Lal, Jacob Jentzer, Kianoush Kashani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Osama MukhtarDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Amos LalDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jacob JentzerDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kianoush KashaniDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the predictive value of SCAI shock staging for mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock admitted to the medical ICU. Materials and methods: This is a single-center historical cohort study. We analyzed data for adults (≥18-year-old) admitted to the medical ICU at Mayo Clinic St. Mary's campus with sepsis between June 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. Sepsis was identified using the Sepsis-III criteria. Patients were stratified based on SCAI shock staging. Our primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality. Results: We identified 3079 eligible adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. The distribution of SCAI shock stages A through E was 9%, 12%, 25%, 49%, and 5%, respectively. The overall 30-day mortality was 24%. There was progression in all outcomes including ICU, hospital and 30-day mortality across SCAI shock stages. However, only SCAI shock stages D and E, had statistically significant adjusted HRs of 1.6 and 3, respectively. When compared to SOFA score, SCAI shock staging performed similarly in predicting ICU mortality with no statistically significant difference in AUCs, Conclusions: Our results support the use of SCAI shock staging in critically ill medical patients with sepsis and septic shock for risk stratification. We propose that the SCAI shock staging may be used as a universal system for grading the severity of shock in critically ill patients regardless of etiology.

Indexed as

Critical careMortalityRisk stratificationSCAIScoreSepsisShock

Identifiers

PMID39867142
PMCPMC11759074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.