Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39867107›Full record

ArticleAdvanced therapeutics2025

Biomaterial Cues for Regulation of Osteoclast Differentiation and Function in Bone Regeneration.

Kaavian Shariati, Meiwand Bedar, Kelly X Huang, Shahrzad Moghadam, Sarah Mirzaie, Jonnby S LaGuardia, Wei Chen, Youngnam Kang, Xiaoyan Ren, Justine C Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kaavian ShariatiDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Meiwand BedarDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Kelly X HuangDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Shahrzad MoghadamDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Sarah MirzaieDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Jonnby S LaGuardiaDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Wei ChenDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Youngnam KangDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Xiaoyan RenDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Justine C LeeDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8943-0837

Funding

PRECLINICAL EVALUATION OF NANOPARTICULATE MINERALIZED COLLAGEN GLYCOSAMINOGLYCAN MATERIALS IN CALVARIAL REGENERATIONR01DE028098 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LEE, JUSTINE CHIA · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Osteoclast modulatory biomaterials for skull regenerationR01DE029234 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LEE, JUSTINE CHIA · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE028098NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE029234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue regeneration involves dynamic dialogue between and among different cells and their surrounding matrices. Bone regeneration is specifically governed by reciprocity between osteoblasts and osteoclasts within the bone microenvironment. Osteoclast-directed resorption and osteoblast-directed formation of bone are essential to bone remodeling, and the crosstalk between these cells is vital to curating a sequence of events that culminate in the creation of bone tissue. Among bone biomaterial strategies, many have investigated the use of different material cues to direct the development and activity of osteoblasts. However, less attention has been given to exploring features that similarly target osteoclast formation and activity, with even fewer strategies demonstrating or integrating biomaterial-directed modulation of osteoblast-osteoclast coupling. This review aims to describe various biomaterial cues demonstrated to influence osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast function, emphasizing those that enhance a material construct's ability to achieve bone healing and regeneration. Additionally discussed are approaches that influence the communication between osteoclasts and osteoblasts, particularly in a manner that takes advantage of their coupling. Deepening our understanding of how biomaterial cues may dictate osteoclast differentiation, function, and influence on the microenvironment may enable the realization of bone-replacement interventions with enhanced integrative and regenerative capacities.

Indexed as

bone biomaterialbone regenerationosteoclastosteoclastogenesis

Identifiers

PMID39867107
PMCPMC11756815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.