ReviewCureus2024
The Association Between Tuberculosis and Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential value of vitamin D as adjunctive therapy in osteoarticular tuberculosis: a comprehensive review.Infection · 2026Review
- Risk factor of osteoporosis in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital in Indonesia.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Chronic type 2 odontoid fracture with atlantoaxial spondyloptosis in an adult: a case report and literature review.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent research suggests that tuberculosis (TB) may pose a potential risk factor for osteoporosis, although the available evidence remains limited. This study aimed to comprehensively assess osteoporosis risk in TB patients through systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. Two investigators independently conducted a literature search using the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) databases up to April 2024. Eligible longitudinal cohort studies had to evaluate the impact of active or a history of TB on the risk of osteoporosis and/or osteoporotic fractures. Point estimates and standard errors from each eligible study were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird's generic inverse variance method. Of 2,062 articles (1,765 from EMBASE and 297 from MEDLINE) reviewed, three retrospective cohort studies, comprising a total of 531,624 participants (174,726 patients with TB and 356,898 participants without TB), met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis of three studies revealed an increased risk of osteoporosis among TB patients, with a pooled hazard ratio of 1.40 (95% CI, 1.26 - 1.57;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.