Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) in Elderly Patients: Insights Into Recovery, Complications, and Risk Factors.

backgroundWe compared the safety and efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in elderly men (aged ≥75 years) with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

methodsA retrospective analysis of 151 patients (HoLEP: 72; TURP: 79) was conducted. Preoperative and postoperative parameters, including prostate size, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), catheterization duration, hospital stay, and perioperative complications (incontinence and dysuria), were analyzed.

resultsHoLEP significantly reduced catheterization (22 hours vs. 50 hours) and hospitalization times (one day vs. three days) compared to TURP (p < 0.01). However, HoLEP was associated with longer operation times (81.89 min vs. 67.95 min; p < 0.01) and higher rates of dysuria (65.3% vs. 27.8%) and transient incontinence (27.8% vs. 8.9%; p < 0.001).

conclusionHoLEP offers significant perioperative benefits over TURP, particularly in shortening recovery times; however, further investigation is required to address the higher rates of dysuria and incontinence. Although the retrospective design and surgeon experience constitute limitations, these findings underscore the need for prospective studies. The results support personalized surgical decision-making, emphasizing patient-specific factors such as body mass index (BMI). These insights may help refine perioperative management and improve collaborative decision-making to enhance outcomes in elderly patients with BPH.