Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39866984›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Primary Healthcare Centre Improvement and Privatisation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.

Zainab Albaher, Heba Alqurashi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zainab AlbaherQuality Management, Tadawi General Hospital, Dammam, SAU.
Heba AlqurashiPublic Health, Saudi Electronic University, Dammam, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saudi Arabia prioritises primary healthcare reform to address challenges like population growth, high demand, high costs, and unequal access. The 2030 vision aims to integrate and maintain primary healthcare centre (PHC) services, while the healthcare privatisation plan seeks to modernise and expand primary care, medical cities, and dialysis centres. A search was run on different databases, and 18 studies were included in the review based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from the studies, which included the aim of the study, sample characteristics, study characteristics, and outcomes. This systematic review integrated findings from 18 recent studies on Saudi PHC services, infrastructure, workforce, policies, and reforms. The evidence depicts a system with strengths in some areas like immunisation but substantial gaps in critical domains like chronic disease management, preventive care, health information systems, care coordination, and equity. Patients face organisational, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers that impede PHC access and force overreliance on emergency services. Moreover, the PHC system faces significant gaps in areas like preventive care, health information systems, care coordination, and equity, with patients facing organisational, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers that impede access and overreliance on emergency services. Workforce limitations, particularly in rural areas, contribute to suboptimal quality. Strengthening PHCs is crucial for achieving Saudi Vision 2030 goals of improved population health outcomes, user experience, care integration, and healthcare sustainability.

Indexed as

managementpoliciesprimary healthcare centerssaudi arabiasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39866984
PMCPMC11758590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.