ReviewCureus2024
Primary Healthcare Centre Improvement and Privatisation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with healthcare seeking behavior from private clinics among patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- From vision to value: a mixed methods evaluation of patient-centered care in Saudi Arabian primary healthcare centers.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Neonatal nurses' e-health literacy and technology‑mediated clinical practice: a cross-sectional analysis of digital health competencies and practice patterns.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Saudi Arabia prioritises primary healthcare reform to address challenges like population growth, high demand, high costs, and unequal access. The 2030 vision aims to integrate and maintain primary healthcare centre (PHC) services, while the healthcare privatisation plan seeks to modernise and expand primary care, medical cities, and dialysis centres. A search was run on different databases, and 18 studies were included in the review based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from the studies, which included the aim of the study, sample characteristics, study characteristics, and outcomes. This systematic review integrated findings from 18 recent studies on Saudi PHC services, infrastructure, workforce, policies, and reforms. The evidence depicts a system with strengths in some areas like immunisation but substantial gaps in critical domains like chronic disease management, preventive care, health information systems, care coordination, and equity. Patients face organisational, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers that impede PHC access and force overreliance on emergency services. Moreover, the PHC system faces significant gaps in areas like preventive care, health information systems, care coordination, and equity, with patients facing organisational, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers that impede access and overreliance on emergency services. Workforce limitations, particularly in rural areas, contribute to suboptimal quality. Strengthening PHCs is crucial for achieving Saudi Vision 2030 goals of improved population health outcomes, user experience, care integration, and healthcare sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.