ReviewCureus2024
Evaluating the Role of Allopurinol in Mitigating Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gout, Uric Acid, and Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This meta-analysis investigates the potential of allopurinol to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), a common and serious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CIN is particularly prevalent among high-risk populations, including patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS), where the administration of contrast agents can exacerbate renal injury. Allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, is known for its dual action in reducing oxidative stress and uric acid production, positioning it as a promising therapeutic candidate to mitigate CIN. The analysis included eight studies encompassing a total of 929 patients undergoing PCI, with a mean age of 63 years. These studies compared the effects of allopurinol with placebo across varying doses and contrast agent types. The results demonstrated a significant reduction in CIN incidence with allopurinol, yielding a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.26 [95% CI (0.12, 0.56), P = 0.0006]. Despite the encouraging findings, moderate heterogeneity was observed (I² = 59%), likely arising from variations in study design, patient demographics, and the types of contrast agents used. Sensitivity analysis focusing on studies employing the contrast agent Omnipaque provided further support for the efficacy of allopurinol, with pronounced benefits observed in patients with CKD or ACS. These findings underline the potential of allopurinol as a preventive measure against CIN, especially in high-risk populations. However, the identified heterogeneity and inherent limitations of the included studies highlight the critical need for larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials to confirm these results, establish optimal dosing protocols, and explore the broader applicability of allopurinol in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.