ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of Ad26.COV2.S co-administered with a quadrivalent standard-dose or high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine: a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A group 1 hemagglutinin stem vaccine elicits broad humoral responses against influenza in phase 1/2a study.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Review
- Progress in combination vaccines and the co-administration of influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vaccine co-administration can increase vaccination coverage. We assessed the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of concomitant administration of Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 vaccine with seasonal influenza vaccines. Methods: This non-inferiority, Phase 3, randomised, double-blind study enrolled 859 healthy adults and was conducted between 02 November 2021 and 28 November 2022. Participants aged ≥18-64 years were randomised to receive a seasonal quadrivalent standard dose (SD) influenza vaccine ( Findings: Non-inferiority criteria for concomitant administration in the SD groups were met for SARS-CoV-2 Spike-specific antibodies (ratio 1.11, 95% CI 0.97-1.26) and haemagglutinin inhibition titres for all influenza strains (A/H3N2 1.23, 95% CI 1.05-1.45; B/Victoria 0.99, 95% CI 0.84-1.19; B/Yamagata, 1.03, 95% CI 0.88-1.21) except A/H1N1 (1.28, 95% CI 1.09-1.53) for which the upper limit of the 95% CI was >1.5. Concomitant administration of Ad26.COV2.S and SD influenza vaccine induced robust immune responses in terms of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-specific antibodies and haemagglutinin inhibition to all four influenza strains. Seroconversion and seroprotection rates against all influenza vaccine strains were comparable in the Coad and Control groups. Anti-Spike antibodies 28 days after receiving Ad26.COV2.S were similar whether administered with influenza vaccine or alone. Antibody responses persisted at least 6 months post-vaccination in all groups. The reactogenicity and safety profile following co-administration was consistent with the known safety profiles of the study vaccines. No safety concerns were identified. Coadministration was immunogenic and well tolerated in adults aged ≥65 years who received HD influenza vaccine. Interpretation: Co-administration of seasonal influenza vaccine with Ad26.COV2.S was immunogenic with an acceptable safety profile, supporting co-administration of these vaccines. Funding: Janssen Vaccines & Prevention BV and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.