ReviewTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
Phage therapy in the management of respiratory and pulmonary infections: a systematic review.
Review in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Characteristics of Respiratory Microbiome in COPD-A Literature Review.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Review
- Hospital-adapted inhaled phage therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: a comparative pilot study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Phage therapy for multidrug-resistant pulmonary infections: bridging precision matching, lung delivery, host immunity, and clinical translation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- [Research Progress on the Regulatory Mechanism of Respiratory Microbiota in the Comorbidity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) pose a significant threat to global health, causing more than 2 million deaths worldwide. This menace is intensified by the alarming increase in drug resistance, which limits the availability of effective antibiotics for bacterial respiratory infections. Consequently, there is an urgent demand for alternative therapeutic options. Phage therapy (PT) has re-emerged as a promising therapeutic approach and as an adjunct to antibiotic treatment. Objective: This systematic review synthesises the application of PT for LRTIs in humans, providing unified and updated data on the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of PT for LRTIs. Design: Systematic review. Data sources and methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy was carried out (spanning January 2000 - February 2024) in four databases: PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science to retrieve published records of PT for LRTIs in humans only. The reference list of each included study was evaluated for possible inclusion of other relevant articles. Results: Among the 18 records that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 70 patients were administered PT. Microbiologically, 71.42% ( Conclusion: Based on recently published data originating mainly from observational studies, PT has shown considerable efficacy and safety in the treatment of LRTIs. However, there is a lack of uniform methodologies and protocols across different PT cases in the management of LRTIs. Consequently, there is a need for additional clinical studies to establish standardised pharmacokinetic elements and an overall protocol for PT. By doing so, we can fully unlock the potential of PT in effectively managing clinical bacterial infections, including LRTIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.