Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39866814›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2025

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective, Single-Center Experience on the Role of Endoscopy and Outcomes.

Ali M Someili, Sarah Jaber Mobarki, Razan Hamoud Moafa, Leena Nageeb Alsury, Roaa Hassan Shadad, Shroog Mohammed Fathi, Amnah Hussain Hamrani, Afnan Mohammed Darisi, Amal H Mohamed, Sameer Alqassmi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ali M SomeiliDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah Jaber MobarkiFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Razan Hamoud MoafaFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Leena Nageeb AlsuryFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Roaa Hassan ShadadFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Shroog Mohammed FathiFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Amnah Hussain HamraniFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Afnan Mohammed DarisiFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Amal H MohamedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.
Sameer AlqassmiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.
Mostafa MohragDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9353-6520
Mohammed AbdulrasakDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Malmo, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common and potentially fatal medical emergency. This study aimed to investigate the frequency, causes, outcomes, and efficacy of endoscopy in the treatment of UGIB at King Fahad Central Hospital in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Methods: Between January 2017 and December 2023, a retrospective study was performed including all hospitalized patients with UGIB. This research investigated sociodemographic characteristics, clinical history, endoscopic findings, treatment options, and results using statistical analysis, which included both descriptive and inferential approaches. Results: The study included 483 patients (of which 74.1% men), with a mean age of 53.9 ± 19.5 years. Hematemesis was observed in 67.5% of the patients, whereas melena occurred in 49.7% of the cases. Two-hundred sixty-two (54.2%) patients underwent endoscopy within the first 24 h from presentation. The most frequent endoscopic findings were esophageal varices (52.2%) and duodenal ulcers (21.7%). Bandings accounted for 48.0% of all endoscopic procedures, whereas 36.9% of the patients received epinephrine injections along with endoclips. Medical therapy mostly consisted of a mix of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and octreotide. A significant minority (43.5%) of the patients stayed in the hospital for 1 - 3 days, while 59.6% did not need blood transfusions. During the first 3 days, 7% of patients experienced rebleeding, with a 6% mortality rate. Using multivariate regression analysis, rebleeding was strongly associated with initial presentation with shock (P < 0.001), renal disease (P = 0.01), and increased transfusion requirement (P = 0.001). Mortality was strongly associated with steroid usage (P = 0.007), increasing transfusion requirements (P < 0.0001), and rebleeding (P = 0.002). Conclusions: Timely endoscopy and proper treatment dramatically improved UGIB results. Identifying those who are at high risk and acting swiftly is a critical step in reducing the likelihood of recurrent bleeding and fatality.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyMortalityProton pump inhibitorsRebleedingSaudi ArabiaUlcer

Identifiers

PMID39866814
PMCPMC11753981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.