Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39866715›Full record

ReviewGastro hep advances2025

The Clinical Utility of Anorectal Manometry: A Review of Current Practices.

Eleanor Aubrey Belilos, Zoë Post, Sierra Anderson, Mark DeMeo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastro hep advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Beyond stapled transanal rectal resectionWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eleanor Aubrey BelilosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Zoë PostDivision of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Sierra AndersonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Mark DeMeoDivision of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

J. NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002388 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ALI KESHAVARZIAN, Sonia Kupfer · 2017 to 2026
$6.7M
FITting noninvasive testing into Lynch syndrome colorectal cancer surveillance: a multicenter, prospective trialR01CA287257 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Fay Kastrinos, Sonia Kupfer · 2024 to 2026
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002388NCI NIH HHS R01 CA287257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anorectal manometry (ARM) is a diagnostic test that utilizes pressure sensors to dynamically measure intraluminal anal and rectal pressures, thus providing an objective evaluation of anorectal functional parameters (tone, contractility, and relaxation), coordination and reflex activity, and sensation. ARM is a useful test for numerous indications including for the assessment and management of functional anorectal disorders such as fecal incontinence, functional defecatory disorders, and functional anorectal pain, preoperative assessment of anorectal function, and in facilitating/assessing response to biofeedback training. In addition, while many functional anorectal disorders present with overlapping symptoms (ie constipation, anorectal pain), ARM allows delineation of more specific disease processes and may guide treatment more effectively. In recent years the development of advanced manometric methodologies such as high-resolution anorectal manometry has also led to improved spatial resolution of data acquisition, further increasing the potential for the expansion of ARM. However, despite its ability to provide detailed information on anorectal and pelvic floor muscle function and synergy as well as the endorsements of several national and international organizations, ARM is still infrequently utilized in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to address the current clinical applications and limitations of ARM for various disorders of the lower gastrointestinal tract. In so doing, we will provide clinicians with a framework for the use of ARM in clinical practice. This review will also discuss potential barriers to widespread adoption of ARM in clinical practice and propose possible solutions to these challenges.

Indexed as

Anorectal ManometryBiofeedback TherapyConstipationDefecatory DisorderFecal Incontinence

Identifiers

PMID39866715
PMCPMC11761937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.