Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39866713›Full record

ArticleGastro hep advances2025

Text Message System for the Prediction of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Adequacy Before Colonoscopy: An Artificial Intelligence Image Classification Algorithm Based on Images of Stool Output.

Chethan Ramprasad, Divya Saini, Henry Del Carmen, Lev Krasnovsky, Rajat Chandra, Ryan Mcgregor, Russell T Shinohara, Eric Eaton, Meghna Gummadi, Shivan Mehta and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastro hep advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07740122 (FECAL-AI), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07740122 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

FECAL-AI: Prospective Observational Validation of AI-Based Stool Image Analysis Against Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Neoplasia Risk Assessment

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorServicio de Salud Metropolitano Sur OrienteRan2026 to 2026Enrolled250ConditionsColorectal NeoplasmsArmsAI-Based Stool Image Analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chethan RamprasadDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Divya SainiPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Henry Del CarmenPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lev KrasnovskyPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Rajat ChandraPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ryan McgregorPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Russell T ShinoharaPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Eric EatonDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Meghna GummadiDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Shivan MehtaDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
James D LewisDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING IN GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007740 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI James D Lewis · 1997 to 2026
$9.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Inadequate bowel preparation which occurs in 25% of colonoscopies is a major barrier to the effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer. We aim to develop an artificial intelligence (machine learning) algorithm to assess photos of stool output after bowel preparation to predict inadequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Methods: Patients were asked to text a photo of their stool in the commode when they believed that they neared completion of their colonoscopy bowel preparation. Boston Bowel Preparation Scores of 7 and below were labeled as inadequate or fair. Boston Bowel Preparation Scores of 8 and 9 were considered good. A binary classification image-based machine learning algorithm was designed. Results: In a test set of 61 images, the binary classification machine learning algorithm was able to distinguish inadequate/fair preparation from good preparation with a positive predictive value of 78.6% and a negative predictive value of 60.8%. In a test set of 56 images, the algorithm was able to distinguish normal colonoscopy duration (<25 minutes) from long colonoscopy duration (>25 minutes) with a positive predictive value of 78.6% and a negative predictive value of 65.5%. Conclusion: Patients are willing to submit photos of their stool output during bowel preparation through text messages before colonoscopy. This machine learning algorithm demonstrates the ability to predict inadequate/fair preparation from good preparation based on image classification of stool output. It was less accurate to predict long duration of colonoscopy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBowel PreparationColonoscopyTechnology Positive

Identifiers

PMID39866713
PMCPMC11760837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.