ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Post-processing enhances protein secondary structure prediction with second order deep learning and embeddings.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial Peptides Against Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria: Focus on Machine Learning.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein Secondary Structure Prediction (PSSP) is regarded as a challenging task in bioinformatics, and numerous approaches to achieve a more accurate prediction have been proposed. Accurate PSSP can be instrumental in inferring protein tertiary structure and their functions. Machine Learning and in particular Deep Learning approaches show promising results for the PSSP problem. In this paper, we deploy a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) trained with the Subsampled Hessian Newton (SHN) method (a Hessian Free Optimisation variant), with a two- dimensional input representation of embeddings extracted from a language model pretrained with protein sequences. Utilising a CNN trained with the SHN method and the input embeddings, we achieved on average a 79.96% per residue (Q3) accuracy on the CB513 dataset and 81.45% Q3 accuracy on the PISCES dataset (without any post-processing techniques applied). The application of ensembles and filtering techniques to the results of the CNN improved the overall prediction performance. The Q3 accuracy on the CB513 increased to 93.65% and for the PISCES dataset to 87.13%. Moreover, our method was evaluated using the CASP13 dataset where we showed that as the post-processing window size increased, the prediction performance increased as well. In fact, with the biggest post-processing window size (limited by the smallest CASP13 protein), we achieved a Q3 accuracy of 98.12% and a Segment Overlap (SOV) score of 96.98 on the CASP13 dataset when the CNNs were trained with the PISCES dataset. Finally, we showed that input representations from embeddings can perform equally well as representations extracted from multiple sequence alignments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.