ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025
Characterizing Wellness Initiatives in Academic Radiation Oncology Departments.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gender disparities in academic radiation oncology research: A narrative review.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Burnout is prevalent in radiation oncology (RO), and an increased focus on promoting physician wellness and formalizing wellness-directed efforts has transpired in recent years. We aimed to characterize current wellness leadership positions and efforts within academic RO departments. Methods and Materials: Academic RO department chairs were contacted to inquire whether they had a departmental wellness leader with a request for leader contact information, if applicable. Wellness leaders were invited to complete an anonymous survey in January and February 2023 using Qualtrics. Questions assessed leader demographic characteristics, role structure and resources, current initiatives, and impacts to date. Descriptive statistics and summaries of free-text responses are reported. Results: A total of 120 chairs were contacted. In total, 71 (59%) responded, with 43 (61%) having departmental wellness leaders, of which 17 (39.5%) responded, to the survey. A total of 70.6% were female, and 76.5% were physician faculty. Most respondents were early-career. The most common previously implemented initiatives included offering programming and education (33.3%) and improved access to mental health services (25%). The most common active initiatives include conducting studies to address root causes of burnout (41.7%), developing specific wellness goals (25%), performing a review of policies that encourage prolonged work hours (25%), and offering programming and education (25%). Challenges included limited bandwidth (66.7%), lack of funding (41.7%), and lack of departmental interest in organizing or attending events (33.3%). Leaders highlight the importance of a dedicated individual to tangibly implement changes and the unique opportunity of someone within RO to understand the specific challenges faced by those in our field. Conclusions: Wellness leadership roles exist in many RO departments. As evidenced by a limited number of fully implemented initiatives, these roles are new and evolving. A focus on wellness has the potential to bring positive change to departments; however, the impact of newly established wellness roles on culture and balance requires longitudinal followup.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.