Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39866573›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Development of metastasis and survival prediction model of luminal and non-luminal breast cancer with weakly supervised learning based on pathomics.

Hui Liu, Linlin Ying, Xing Song, Xueping Xiang, Shumei Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hui LiuDepartments of Clinical Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Linlin YingDepartments of Clinical Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xing SongDepartments of Clinical Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xueping XiangDepartments of Clinical Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Shumei WeiDepartments of Clinical Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Breast cancer stands as the most prevalent form of cancer among women globally. This heterogeneous disease exhibits varying clinical behaviors. The stratification of breast cancer patients into risk groups, determined by their metastasis and survival outcomes, is pivotal for tailoring personalized treatments and therapeutic interventions. The pathological sections of radical specimens encompass a diverse range of histological information pertinent to the metastasis and survival of patients. In this study, our objective is to develop a deep learning model utilizing pathological images to predict the metastasis and survival outcomes for breast cancer patients. Methods: This study utilized pathological sections from 204 radical mastectomy specimens obtained between January 2013 and December 2014 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College of Zhejiang University. The 204 pathological slices were scanned and transformed into whole slide imaging (WSI), with manual labeling of all tumor areas. The WSI was then partitioned into smaller tiles measuring 512 × 512 pixels. Three networks, namely Densely Connected Convolutional Network 121 (DenseNet121), Residual Network (ResNet50), and Inception_v3, were assessed. Subsequently, we combined patch-level predictions, probability histograms, and Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) features to create comprehensive participants representations. These features served as the foundational input for developing a machine learning algorithm for metastasis analysis and a Cox regression model for survival analysis. Result: Our results show that the Inception_v3 model shows a particularly robust patch recognition ability for estrogen receptor (ER) recognition. Our pathological model shows high accuracy in predicting tumor regions. The train area under the curve (AUC) of the Inception_v3 model based on supervised learning is 0.975, which is higher than the model established by weakly supervised learning. But the AUC of the metastasis prediction in training and testing sets is higher than value based on supervised learning. Furthermore, the C-index of the survival prediction model is 0.710 in the testing sets, which is also better than the value by supervised learning. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the significant potential of deep learning models in predicting breast cancer metastasis and prognosis, with the pathomic model showing high accuracy in identifying tumor areas and ER status. The integration of clinical features and pathomics signature into a nomogram further provides a valuable tool for clinicians to make individualized treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningSupervised Machine LearningAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisBreast cancerMetastasis prediction modelPathomicsSurvival prediction modelWeakly supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39866573
PMCPMC11759606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.