ArticleHeliyon2025
Construction of a novel cuproptosis-related gene signature and integrative analyses in cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cuproptosis is a unique form of cell death that is dependent on copper, which is fundamentally different from other recognized forms of cell death. However, the molecular and immune characteristics in cuproptosis-defined subgroups of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remain to be further illustrated. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive investigation into the genetic and transcriptional variation, prognostic significance, and expression profiles of 16 cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs). To construct a prognostic signature based on differentially expressed genes between molecular subtypes, we employed LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analyses. We then assessed the values of this signature in prognostic prediction, immune infiltration, and therapeutic responses in CCA. The robustness of the signature was further validated in the GEO and IMvigor210 cohorts. Additionally, qRT-PCR and Western blotting (WB) were utilized to confirm the expression of the signature genes across different cell lines. Results: A total of 16 CRGs were analyzed revealed differentially expressed, and two CRG-related clusters were identified, which displayed contrasting survival times.Then, a robust cuproptosis-related risk model was established and was an independent prognostic factor for CCA, which was further validated across two external cohorts. Low-risk patients had a better overall survival than high-risk patients. The comprehensive results showed that a low-risk score was correlated with metabolism-related pathways, high infiltration of CD8 T cells, B cells, and M1 macrophages, active immunity and less aggressive phenotypes, high chemotherapeutic sensitivity, and more benefit from immunotherapy. In contrast, a high-risk score was associated with cancer and metastasis-related pathways, high infiltration of M2 macrophages, high expression of immune checkpoint genes, suppressive immunity and more aggressive phenotypes, and less benefit from chemotherapeutic and immunotherapy. In addition, the critical CRGs were further validated through qRT-PCR and WB. Conclusions: We developed a novel risk model for CCA patients, which serves as a promising biomarker for distinguishing prognosis as well as molecular and immune characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.