ArticleHeliyon2025
Streptococcal periorbital necrotizing fasciitis: Case series on a rare but potentially life-threatening entity.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of computed tomography scan in assessment of patient with herpes zoster opthalmicus complicated with periorbital necrotizing fasciitis.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Periorbital necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) is a rare entity caused either by polymicrobial infection (type 1) or Streptococcus pyogenes and/or Staphylococcus species (type 2). A high level of clinical suspicion is necessary to make the diagnosis. We present 3 cases of NSTI illustrating our diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Patients and methods: The main outcome measures were laboratory and clinical findings at initial presentation, microorganism cultured, predisposing conditions and the number of debridements needed as well as final outcomes. Results: Biomarkers of inflammation in blood samples were elevated at admission and Streptococcus pyogenes was cultured in all three cases. Clinical suspicion of this rare disease and prompt surgical treatment was crucial to confirm the diagnosis.Imaging and laboratory workup, however, did not prove to be diagnostically helpful in our cases. We performed early and consequent debridement of necrotic tissue to control the infection alongside adequate systemic antibiotic therapy including clindamycin in all cases of suspected NSTI. As intraoperative findings revealed necrotic tissue even in an apparently quiet situs, we decided to debride the wound daily after the first surgery until there is very little or no necrotic tissue to debride seen intraoperatively. Conclusions: Based on the negative experience with our first case, we developed a more aggressive surgical plan for cases with periorbital NSTI. After early debridement, the patient is surgically reevaluated on a daily basis until surgery is deemed to have been unnecessary. We follow this approach, as necrotic tissue is sometimes identified intraoperatively from a lack of resistance to manipulation rather than from its clinical aspect alone. At a later point, plastic surgery may be required when the infection is under control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.