ArticlePhysical therapy research2024
The Impact of Multidisciplinary Team Intervention for Early Mobilization of Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Stroke Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Physical therapy research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the impact of multidisciplinary team (MDT) intervention for early mobilization (EM) of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in the intensive care unit (ICU).
methodsA retrospective uncontrolled before-after observational study was conducted to assess patient outcomes before and after introducing MDT in the stroke care unit (SCU). Participants admitted to the SCU from April 2017 to September 2023 were categorized into conventional (April 2017 to June 2020) and MDT (July 2020 to September 2023) groups. The measured primary outcome was the days until sitting, standing, and walking commenced.
resultsA total of 131 patients were screened, with 115 included in the analysis. The MDT group comprised 56 individuals (48.7%), whereas the conventional group consisted of 59 patients (51.3%). The MDT group exhibited a significantly shorter duration until sitting (4 [3-7] vs. 7 [5-17], p <0.001), standing (5 [3-7] vs. 10 [5-17], p <0.001), and walking (7 [5-10] vs. 16 [7-23], p <0.001) commenced. Furthermore, the MDT group showed a significantly higher ICU mobility scale (IMS) (8 [5-8] vs. 5 [3-8], p <0.001) at SCU discharge, shorter length of SCU stay (16 [15-17] vs. 17 [15-24], p = 0.048), and hospital stay (34 [25-48] vs. 48 [33-80], p = 0.006).
conclusionThis study suggests that MDT played a facilitative role in promoting the EM of patients with aSAH. Their involvement streamlined the mobilization process, shortening the days until the initiation of mobilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.